The Rohan Theatre has always been an unusual kind
of theatre, indeed some have questioned whether it should be called
a “theatre” at all, as it has never been associated
with a specific building, nor has it ever put on conventional performances.
Nonetheless, its works are well known and have influenced the evolution
of European culture for the past century.
It was founded in 1891 by five
disenchanted poets (Rebus Kraven, Oliver Coffyn, Count Eric Stenbock
(known to his friends as Harry), Frances Featherstone (known to
his friends as Alex), and Niles Alain) who met in the decadent atmosphere
of late Victorian Brighton, and were each troubled, for his own
reasons, by the increasing complacency of audiences, and the self-satisfied
grandiosity of contemporary performers, such as Sir Henry Irving.
They vowed to create a new kind of theatre, one where art did not
imitate life, but life imitated art.
Their original manifesto (amended
in 1906) was secretly printed in 1892 and was rapidly distributed
amongst various underground networks of radical artists all across
the continent, many of whom saw the Rohan Theatre as a justification
for larger scale social agitation. By 1901 it was the largest underground
association of thinkers, poets, painters, musicians and aesthetes
in Europe.
Among the first successes of
the Rohan Theatre was Harry Stenbock’s “Petit Comte”.
For the last 3 years of his life (1892-1895) he was accompanied
everywhere he went by a life-size wooden doll, which he referred
to as “Le Petit Comte”. He would behave towards this
doll in every way as if it were his son and heir. The “Theatre”
was not his own knowing performance, but that of all those around
him who, because he was a Count, or because they thought him both
rich and mad, would also treat the doll as if it were real. He even
paid a Jesuit minister to educate the “Petit Comte”,
and would sit and watch the poor man for hours as he attempted to
drill the doll in Greek and Latin. This single example gives a clear
indication of the nature and spirit of the Rohan Theatre, although,
of course not all projects work over such a long period of time.
Another, now infamous example
of a performance by the Rohan Theatre was the staged riot at the
premiere of Igor Stravinsky’s “The Rite of Spring”.
Performed in collaboration with Diagilev Najinsky, and Stravinsky
himself, who had in the past contributed to a number of Rohan Theatre
performances, the riot was initially started by four actors, whose
abusive shouts were written by Featherstone and whose “fistifuffs”
were choreographed by Najinsky. The Rohan Theatre performance began
once the audience were drawn into the fight, and then still further
with press reports, and the building of the myth of the “riot
at the Rite”. In many ways this performance is still ongoing.
Many leading 20th century artists
have acknowledged their debt of inspiration to the Rohan Theatre
over the years, and some have commemorated it (in a veiled but nonetheless
distinct manner) in their works. Among these, the most important
references are in Herman Hesse’s novel “Steppenwolf”
and Franz Kafka’s “America”. Both of these references
play on the Rohan Theatre’s essential blurring of where theatre
starts and reality stops. Hesse is himself thought to have been
involved in a Rohan Theatre performance in June 1926, and the “Magic
Theatre” that appears throughout “Steppenwolf”
with the flickering electric sign “For Madmen Only”
or “Entrance Not For Everybody” is clearly a reference
to the Rohan Theatre. Franz Kafka’s “Oklahoma Theatre”
plays a similar role in his novel “America” and the
conclusion can only be the same, although there is no evidence of
Kafka’s direct involvement with the Rohan Theatre.
The name “Rohan”
comes from the first names of the original founders – Rebus,
Oliver, Harry, Alex and Niles, as initialled on the original manifesto
of 1891.
To learn more of the history
of the Rohan Theatre, its activities and its founders click on the
history button above.
To recognise a performance by
the Rohan Theatre would be to undermine its very nature, and hence
its shows are always credited to others. If you think you have seen
a performance by the Rohan Theatre, you are either mistaken, or
the performance failed.